American Physical Society
APS SitesAPSJournalsPhysicsCentralPhysicsFocus
 
Become a Member | Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals of the American Physical Society
    • APS News
    • Physics Today
    • Physical Review Focus
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Archived Multimedia Presentations
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics for All
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellowships
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Inside APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Guidance
    • Educator Guidance
    • Career Guidance
  • About APS
    • History & Vision
    • Society Governance
    • Support APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
    • Visit Us
Programs
  • Education
    • Why Study Physics?
    • K-12
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
    • Education Conferences
    • Ethics Case Studies
    • Resources
  • International Affairs
  • Physics for All
  • Women in Physics
  • Minorities in Physics
  • Prizes, Awards & Fellowships

 
Home   |   Programs   |   Education   |   Ethics Case Studies   |   Publication Practices   |   Credit for Work

Credit for Work

Email | Print

Description of the Problem

As a graduate student, you have worked closely with a professor and her postdoc on a project studying experimental techniques in microfluidics.  The project is going very well and you’ve even published some of your initial results.   You will be graduating this spring with your master’s degree.  Your advisor is now writing a subsequent paper with a colleague who is developing a theory that accounts for your results.  You see a draft of the paper and notice that you are not listed as one of the four authors of the paper, who are the professors and their senior postdocs.  However, the paper is directly based on the work that you did and includes a new experimental plot that you created in addition to the theoretical calculations.

Question

What should you do?
> View Discussion
Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Privacy | Site Map
    © 2008 American Physical Society