American Physical Society
APS SitesAPSJournalsPhysicsCentralPhysicsFocus
 
Become a Member | Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals of the American Physical Society
    • APS News
    • Physics
    • Physics Today
    • Physical Review Focus
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Archived Multimedia Presentations
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics for All
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellowships
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Fellowships & Fellows
    • Contact APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Physics Job Opportunities
    • Physics Students
    • Tools for Educators
    • Career Guidance
  • About APS
    • Mission Statement
    • Society Governance
    • Society History
    • Support APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
    • Visit Us
Programs
  • Education
    • Why Study Physics?
    • K-12
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
    • Teacher & Educator Support
    • Education Conferences
    • Ethics Case Studies
  • International Affairs
  • Physics for All
  • Women in Physics
  • Minorities in Physics
  • Prizes, Awards & Fellowships

 
Home   |   Programs   |   Education   |   Ethics Case Studies   |   Publication Practices   |   Errata in Previous Research

Errata in Previous Research

Email | Print

Description of the Problem

A research group publishes a couple of papers on an important discovery in two different high impact journals. A new graduate student is given the task of reproducing and extending the work of the advisor and a postdoc. After several weeks of experimentation he realizes that he cannot reproduce the work reported earlier. He even has an explanation for the error.

Questions

What are the optimum courses of action for the student, the advisor and the postdoc, who in the interim, has left to take up a new job.
> View Discussion
Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Privacy | Site Map
    © 2009 American Physical Society