American Physical Society
APS SitesAPSJournalsPhysicsCentralPhysicsFocus
 
Become a Member | Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals of the American Physical Society
    • APS News
    • Physics Today
    • Physical Review Focus
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Archived Multimedia Presentations
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics for All
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellowships
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Inside APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Guidance
    • Educator Guidance
    • Career Guidance
  • About APS
    • History & Vision
    • Society Governance
    • Support APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
    • Visit Us
Programs
  • Education
    • Why Study Physics?
    • K-12
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
    • Education Conferences
    • Ethics Case Studies
    • Resources
  • International Affairs
  • Physics for All
  • Women in Physics
  • Minorities in Physics
  • Prizes, Awards & Fellowships

 
Home   |   Programs   |   Education   |   Ethics Case Studies   |   Publication Practices   |   Fabrication, Falsification and Plagiarism Discussion

Fabrication, Falsification and Plagiarism Discussion

Email | Print

Mistakes can certainly occur in drafting a paper and it’s unwise to make accusations before knowing the full story. If you have questions, as a coauthor of the paper, it is reasonable for you to be satisfied that the revised paper is complete and accurate. You can certainly ask your coworker for clarification without accusing him of altering the original data. If you were worried that he will feel accused in any case, this would also be a question for your mutual advisor. As the PI for this research project (and likely as someone who has refereed many papers as well), your advisor might be in the best position to judge whether the explanation is appropriate.

Gray arrow Submit a Comment (APS Members Only)

Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Privacy | Site Map
    © 2008 American Physical Society