Societies Call for 7% Funding increase in Joint Statement on Scientific Research

The APS along with 22 other organizations spanning the scientific and engineering community issued a Joint Statement on Scientific Research calling for an increase in federal research budgets. At a press conference held at the National Press Building in Washington, D.C. in March, APS President D. Allan Bromley joined with other scientific society presidents in calling on Congress and the Clinton Administration to renew the nation's historical commitment to scientific research and education. Bromley and American Chemical Society President, Paul Anderson amplified the rationale in a nation-wide 15 minute C-Span interview. It is unusual for such a large number of scientific organizations, representing a cross section of scientific and engineering disciplines and about 1.5 million members, to agree to a united position on funding. The text of the Joint Statement on Scientific Research follows:

As the federal government develops its spending plans for Fiscal Year 1998, we call upon the President and Members of Congress to renew the nation's historical commitment to scientific research and education by providing the requisite funding for the federal agencies charged with these responsibilities. Our call is based upon two fundamental principles that are well accepted by policy makers in both political parties.

• The federal investment in scientific research is vital to four national goals: our economic competitiveness, our medical health, our national security and our quality of life.
• Scientific disciplines are interdependent; therefore, a comprehensive approach to science funding provides the greatest opportunity for reaching these goals.

We strongly believe that for our nation to meet the challenges of the next century, agencies charged with carrying out scientific research and education require increases in their respective research budgets of 7 percent for Fiscal Year 1998. These agencies include, among others, the NSF, NIH, DOE, DOD, and NASA. The increases we call for strike a balance between the current fiscal pressures and the need to invest in activities that enable long-term economic growth and productivity. Such increases would only partially restore the inflationary losses that most of these agencies suffered during the last few years.

Prudent planning argues for strengthening the respective activities of major research agencies, as already recognized in pending legislation. To constrain still further federal spending on their scientific programs would jeopardize the future well-being of our nation.